FDCPA Lawsuits Pick Up in Second Half of April, Still Lag 2011 Numbers InsideARM
About 718 different collection firms and creditors were sued.The top courts where lawsuits were filed:
41 Lawsuits: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court – Philadelphia 40 Lawsuits: Illinois Northern District Court – Chicago 36 Lawsuits: Minnesota District Court – Dmn 35 Lawsuits: California Central District Court – Western Division – Los Angeles 30 Lawsuits: New York Eastern District Court – Brooklyn 29 Lawsuits: Colorado District Court – Denver 19 Lawsuits: New York Southern District Court – Foley Square 19 Lawsuits: California Southern District Court – San Diego 19 Lawsuits: California Northern District Court – San Francisco 14 Lawsuits: New York Western District Court – BuffaloThe most active consumer attorneys were:
Representing 29 Consumers: Richard David Faulkner Representing 21 Consumers: Craig T Kimmel Representing 20 Consumers: David R Skinner Representing 15 Consumers: MarkFair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) explained: Violations and remedies.
File a Telephone Harassment Report at centenniallawoffices.com if you are receiving harassing calls from a debt collection company. Watch this ...

Can they violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act?
I posted another question about this earlier so feel free to check it. But here are more details:
In 2003 we owned our own business in Oklahoma. We wanted to place an ad in the yellow pages. So we went through the process, they sent us a fax with the ad proof, and my husband "voice verified" the proof. Neither he nor I ever signed anything regarding this ad, thus making this an oral agreement, correct? When the book came out, they had put the wrong number on the ad. We had been making the preliminary payments, but stopped paying when we knew that they screwed up the ad and told them so.
In July of 2006 we sold the business and moved to Idaho. Now, the Yellow Page book is trying to sue us for the remaining balance. We no longer have copies of the ad and cannot prove that they screwed it up.
However, the "voice verification" occurred on August 8, 2003. That would be the date we entered into the "oral agreement", correct? They filed suit, unbeknownst to us, on August 14,2006. (We did not receive any notification until Feb 28, 2008) The statute of limitations for an oral contract in Oklahoma is 3 years, which it appears they exceeded by 6 days. Also, the FDCPA states that when filing suite regarding an oral agreement, the suit must be filed in the state where the defendant lives currently. They filed in Oklahoma even though we live in Idaho.
Can we claim that they have violated the FDCPA on these two grounds? And if so, what are our chances? They have asked for Summary Judgement twice, but have not receieved it after the court received our responses.
Their own paperwork says "Voice Verified 8/8/03" on the photocopy of the ad proof.
1) Where did you live on the date that the suit was commenced?
a) If you lived in Oklahoma on the date that the lawsuit was filed, whether or not the lawsuit was filed within the Oklahoma Statute of Limitations, then venue is proper in Oklahoma.
b) If you did not live in Oklahoma on the date that the lawsuit was filed, then venue may not be proper in Oklahoma pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
2) The next question to answer is whether the Fair Debt Collection Practices act even applies here for the purposes of venue. If this is a debt incurred by a corporation, limited liability company, etc, (any entity other than yourselves), then the Fair Debt Collection Practices act may not apply. The FDCPA only applies to consumer debts. Another factor to consider is that the FDCPA generally only applies to debt collection agencies. See 15 USC 1692(a)(1)(6) for a more complete definition of debt collection agencies.
3) If the FDCPA applies, then, if venue is properly in Oklahoma, we have to determine whether this is a written or an oral contract. When you signed up for the yellow page ad, you probably signed an sales agreement for the ad. This agreement for the ad is separate from approving the proof of the ad. Since I haven't evaluated your situation, I can't comment further, but its been my experience in working with the yellow pages that they don't start work on the proofs without signature of a contract agreeing to buy the advertising.
I don't know how much money is involved, but I highly suggest that you obtain the services of a competent attorney in Oklahoma to represent you on this matter. With the legal fees you pay you may save yourself paying higher fees later if you try to do it yourself and then have to hire a lawyer to do it right. (if its even possible then).
For a referral, contact the Oklahoma Bar Association. (not licensed in Oklahoma)
They passed the statute, they cannot bring suit. Ask the judge to throw it out.
And ask for a jurisdiction change. If the FDCPA states it has to be in the state YOU reside in, OK judge does not have jurisdiction.
Do this roughly in this order.
The business is just trying to harass you into paying. They probably won't bring suit. Just one last chance before they write the debt off.
But if they do bring suit, you can certainly summons their records, including a copy of the "wrong" ad.
act collection debt fair fdcpa practice - News
|
Debtors filing lawsuits over aggressive collection tactics And, law firms that collect through filing lawsuits. Whatever the business model, third-party collectors historically have fallen under the watch of the FTC, which enforces the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). Some of that responsibility is and more » |
|
Debtors Seethe, Sue Over Collector Tactics And, law firms that collect through filing lawsuits. Whatever the business model, third-party collectors historically have fallen under the watch of the FTC, which enforces the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). Some of that responsibility is and more » |
|
The Fair Debt Collections Practices Act ("FDCPA") Applies Only to Third Pary ... The Fair Debt Collections Practices Act ("FDCPA") Applies Only to Third Pary by Megan Maxfield on 3/23/2012 The Fair Debt Collections Practices Act ("FDCPA"), 15 USC §§ 1692-1692p, is a federal law that was instituted to regulate the collections practices of debt collectors and to protect consumers from abusive debt collection |
|
Stand Up Against Debt Collector Harassment In fact, the Federal Trade Commission received 140036 complaints regarding debt collectors in 2010, which accounted for 27 percent of all complaints the agency received across all industries. Nevertheless, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and more » |
Debt Collectors & Facebook: a Social Media Cautionary Tale
Debt Collectors & Facebook: a Social Media Cautionary TaleShe hems and haws about the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and how it's Very Old and such advances as the Internet, text messaging, and Facebook (if Facebook can be called an advance; I have a Lot of Feelings about that) — but the point she doesn and more »
|
Debt Collectors & Facebook: a Social Media Cautionary TaleShe hems and haws about the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and how it's Very Old and such advances as the Internet, text messaging, and Facebook (if Facebook can be called an advance; I have a Lot of Feelings about that) — but the point she doesn and more »